![]() possibly with debugging xrefs to the lines in the original source, but without incorporating either the source or enough information to reconstruct the AST. ![]() Net, OTOH, in effect distributes the AST as the executable, with the final stages (optimise and convert to opcodes in memory) done at load time.Įven more accessibly, a traditional BASIC would effectively ship a compressed version of the entire source to the end user, making it trivial to list. ![]() So I have /many/ times been asked for a (Pascal etc.) decompiler, by people who thought that since a BASIC program could be listed one written in Pascal was similarly amenable to inspection. But without the AST it's not, and even then you'd lose all comments etc. and possibly some of the variable and function naming.I have been asked to update a program written in 1987 in Delphi (I guess). Is anyone of this files a database? If so can I access it's data? I have no documentation about this program only a few side notes the programmer took that don't make too much sense to make.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |